Do not forget dangers posed by Pak's nukes: UK's ex-Def Sec

Image
Press Trust of India Washington
Last Updated : Mar 05 2015 | 12:02 PM IST
The global community should not forget the dangers posed by Pakistan's nuclear weapons and its two new heavy water plants capable of producing 24 atomic warheads a year, a top former British official has said.
Liam Fox, the former British Defence Secretary, said the international community should not risk to forget Pakistan, which was not a stable country.
"Here in Washington, with all the focus on Iran at the present time, people seem to have forgotten that Pakistan is sitting on something like 120 nuclear warheads and has recently brought into play two new heavy water plants that will enable them to produce about 24 nuclear warheads a year from now on," he said.
"It is the nuclear problem that nobody seems to want to acknowledge and talk about in detail," he said yesterday.
"This is a worry," Fox said at an event organised by the think-tank Center for Strategic and International Studies.
"We've got to the rise of transnational terrorism. It's nothing new, but it changes its manifestations. And of course, the worry that we have is that this nuclear proliferation in places like Pakistan will find its way into the terrorists' game," he said.
Identifying Pakistan as the risk of being a failed states, the former official noted that he said it "not out of malign intent", but because of sheer instability.
"Most of us politically are used to dealing with our opposite numbers. But in a country like Pakistan, where, frankly, we're never really sure who's in charge, whether it's the politicians, the military, or the ISI, we have to develop a whole range of relationships," said Fox, who currently a Member of British Parliament.
From a British perspective, Fox said, he was interested to know as to why, after 200 years of common history, India after partition went on to become a relatively stable, prosperous and increasingly middle class economy, whereas Pakistan effectively rolled backwards from the very beginnings.
"At partition, nobody knew what to call Pakistan because it didn't correspond to any natural, historical or geographical entity. So in fact, it's an acronym. Pakistan is actually a made-up name made up of the initials of the provinces of Punjab, Afghania, Kashmir, and so on.
"I think that it's a fair bet that if your country's name is made up, then it's not probably the most stable entity that you're likely to see," he added.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 05 2015 | 12:02 PM IST

Next Story