State Finance Minister Haseeb Drabu explained in the Legislative Council as to why the government modified the policy and limited its scope to the state subjects.
"The thought behind the policy was that since government estates have no infrastructure, no facilities, so the intention of the government of the time was to give industrial estates to private investment so that there is infrastructure and the units in that estate can be local or from outside and it would function as a regular industrial estate," he said.
"That (clause) had the potential of misuse, which was pointed out also by the Finance (Department) that when they give incentive, they give it to unit and if the investment comes in the industrial estate, it will become free for all and hence, a re-look was required," he said.
"There was a need for an amendment, which we brought through a government order dropping that one para and substituting it with that the private industrial estates will be open to local industrial associations (only)," he added.
The Industrial Policy had come under severe attack from opposition parties as well as separatists, who had decided to carry out a campaign against it. The critics were of the view that the policy will weaken the special status of the state by allowing outsiders to engage in industrialisation.
The minister said the intention behind the policy was to get more and more private players into providing infrastructure for establishing industrial units.
Every industrial estate will remain under the supervision of their corporate body and all the units will become stake holders, he said.
Out of the 545 units that have been set up by the non-state subjects, almost 500 have come before 2005 and the first one -- Chenab Textiles -- was started in 1964 and in fact, today is the largest provider of employment in Jammu and there is no such violation there, he said.
Drabu's statement on the issue of the rollback of the controversial clause came after Legislative Council Chairman on Wednesday directed the government to make the statement on the reasons of the amendment after opposition members led by Congress MLC Ghulam Nabi Monga raised the issue in the House.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
