Explain 'permanent solution' for Kashmir: Cong to Rajnath

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 29 2017 | 9:02 PM IST
The Congress today asked Home Minister Rajnath Singh to explain the contours of a "permanent solution" to solve Kashmir that he talked about and accused the PDP-BJP alliance of driving Jammu and Kashmir to the edge.
The Congress also asked the BJP-led NDA government to open its eyes and realise the extreme damage that the "ideologically incompatible alliance" as well as their continued dithering is doing to the national security of India.
"The Home Minister of India Rajnath Singh has been making rather curious statements to say the least. Would the Home Minister of India care to explain to the people of this country what are the contours and calculations of the phraseology 'permanent solution'," Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari said.
He said anybody who has a nodding acquaintance with history understands that the phrases 'permanent solution' and 'final solution' have had some extremely disturbing implications and history has been witness to the consequences of such an action.
Tewari said historically it has "very disturbing connotations" and if the home minister has chosen to use such a phraseology, he needs to elaborate what it means and what its contours and calculations are.
"What does the government really mean by a 'permanent solution'?" he asked.
The Congress leader said the home minister is a very serious job in India and when he makes a statement "you do not take it lightly, you do believe that there must have been some sort of serious thinking which must have gone into this formulation because the formulation ultimately only articulates or disseminates what is the underlying strategy".
The Congress leader said Kashmir is in an extremely sensitive situation which has been consistently deteriorating since this government came to power and requires careful handling.
"They need to open their eyes and realise extreme damage which both their ideologically incompatible alliance as well as their continued dithering is doing to the national security of India...The manner in which the government is going about, it all appears very cavalier," he said.
Taking on the PDP-BJP government in Kashmir, he said the home minister needs to clarify what he means as a formulation only articulates both intent and the underlying strategy of the government.
Tewari said Singh's statement comes at a time when the PDP-BJP alliance has been "playing Tweedledum and Tweedledee" on an extremely sensitive issue of security in Kashmir.
He said while on one hand Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir Mehbooba Mufti has been passionately advocating that the central government needs to engage with both the Hurriyat and with Pakistan and that this is part of the 'Agenda of Alliance', on the other hand, "the BJP is hellbent upon playing the very jingoistic card".
"This ideologically incompatible alliance between the PDP on one hand and the BJP on the other hand has driven Jammu & Kashmir absolutely to an edge.
"We would like to ask both these parties that if there is so much of ideologically dissonance, if there is no agreement on the agenda of alliance, if the agenda of alliance is not worth the paper it is written on, then why are they continuing in the government together?" he said.
He asked the BJP why it was not pulling out of the alliance and conversely why the PDP continues to be in government when the central government does not pay heed and is not interested in listening to what the chief minister says?
Tewari alleged that this government last year came out with "Insaaniyat, Kashmiriyat and Jamhooriyat" and this year it is "permanent solution", but it is high time the government wakes up to the security situation in Jammu & Kashmir which continues to deteriorate very rapidly.
Asked if the government was trying to derive political mileage out of the Kashmir situation, he said, "We fail to understand that something which undermines the nation, something which damages national security, something which pushes Kashmir to the edge, how could it be politically beneficial to anybody?"
He said the objective of governance is to govern and that is the remit which has been given by the people of India and if one is coming up short on that fundamental tenet of governance and things seem to be chaotic and out of control, Kashmir being just one manifestation, then "I fail to understand how they think they can derive political benefit".
He said, "You can fool some of the people sometimes but you cannot fool all the people all the time and if you think that is a strategy, I am afraid you are deluding yourself".

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 29 2017 | 9:02 PM IST

Next Story