File case against Hema Malini, Maha revenue minister : PIL

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Feb 03 2016 | 9:13 PM IST
A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court today sought a direction to the city Police Commissioner to file a case of cheating and forgery against MP and yesteryear actress Hema Malini and Maharashtra Revenue Minister Eknath Khadse on charges of illegally allotting land for her dance academy at a nominal price.
The PIL, filed by former journalist Ketan Tirodkar, is slated to come up for hearing in due course.
It alleged there have been a series of judgements of the High Court and the Supreme Court stating that public property cannot be allotted by the state without issuing advertisement inviting applications from the needy people.
The petition also alleged that a plot of land was recently allotted to the actress in suburban Andheri for instituting an academy to train students in Indian classical dance of Bharat Natyam in violation of the high court orders and norms.
The petition said that Hema Malini Dance Academy vide its letter dated July 6, 2007, had urged the government to allot alternative land against the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) land in Versova.
The Academy had asked the government to allot 2,000 sq metres of the reserved land for the Dance Academy and proposed to develop a garden on the remaining land by its own trust. This was accepted by the government on July 30, 2010, the PIL said.
The state government subsequently allotted 2,000 sq metres from a total land ad-measuring 29360.50 sq metres reserved for the garden and situated in Ambivili area in suburban Andheri on December 23, 2015, in an order issued by Deputy Secretary Madhav Kale, it added.
The PIL further alleged that the decision was taken after a meeting chaired by the Principal Secretary (Revenue) on December 19, 2015, leading to allotment of land for a pittance amount of Rs 70,000 for a plot worth crores of rupees restored for the Hema Malini Dance Academy.
The petitioner also alleged that another PIL filed by him in the the High Court earlier had opposed illegal allotments of houses from the Chief Minister's discretionary quota.
The petition also cited a case law saying that the Bombay
High Court had struck down government resolutions conferring powers of the Chief Minister to use discretion for allotment of public property and has directed the state to issue a fresh housing policy for disbursing public-owned plots of land.
"Despite this, the state went to the extent of gifting the public property to the ruling party MP for the sake of Bharat Natyam promotion when many poor and needy are deprived from houses under CM quota for want of a policy that is yet to be framed," it added.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 03 2016 | 9:13 PM IST

Next Story