FRA cases: Review of rejected cases complete, number reduces considerably

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 19 2019 | 5:25 PM IST

The number of cases where tribal and non-tribal dwellers could be evicted from forest lands has "reduced considerably" after a review of rejected claims for ownership rights under the Forest Rights Act, officials said Wednesday.

The Supreme Court on February 13 had ordered eviction of 11.8 lakh "illegal forest dwellers" whose claim for land rights had been rejected by authorities. However, on February 28, it stayed the ruling and directed states to file affidavits detailing the process adopted in rejecting the claims.

At a meeting in March, the Ministry of Tribal Affairs asked the states to carry out a village-level scrutiny of 19.50 lakh rejected cases and file their affidavits in the Supreme Court by July 12.

The ministry had said that according to data from the states, around 40.50 lakh claims had been filed under the Forest Rights Act, 2006. Land titles had been granted in around 18.50 lakh cases and 2.50 lakh were pending.

Representatives of the states discussed the matter in detail at a meeting on Tuesday, MoTA Secretary Deepak Khandekar said.

"Barring Jammu and Kashmir and Sikkim, all the states concerned attended the meeting. They have reviewed the cases and segregated information," he said.

"The states are preparing reports which will have information related to cases in which eviction may take place... Now that number is pretty small...it has reduced considerably. The matter highlighted in February is practically over," the official said, refusing to give the details.

The states will inform the ministry about the number of such cases and thereafter, the affidavits will be submitted to the Supreme Court on July 12, he said.

Khandekar said the reduction in number of rejected cases can be attributed to elimination of "duplication and wrongful rejections".

"For example, there were cases where the husband and wife both had claimed ownership of the same property. So the ownership has been granted and the other claim has been junked... Also, there were instances where a person filed multiple applications for one property," he said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 19 2019 | 5:25 PM IST

Next Story