Gokalpur-MLA fraud case:Court quashes order to summon Delhi CP

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 01 2014 | 2:47 PM IST
A court here has set aside an order seeking personal appearance of Delhi Commissioner of Police in a case involving ex-BJP MLA Ranjeet Singh for allegedly faking his caste certificate during the 2013 Assembly elections.
Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Pulastya Pramachala set aside a trial court order, saying it has been observed by superior courts that the presence of higher officers should not be sought, until and unless it is absolutely necessary to summon them.
"Straight away summoning the top most officer of the force could have been avoided and the trial court could have sought report regarding such reasons. The personal appearance of the Commissioner of Police would not have served any purpose," the judge said.
The court further said, "A direction to ensure impartial and independent investigation is conducted under supervision of higher officers coupled with a report for explaining the reasons for half hearted investigation made till date, would have been appropriate course of action."
In the 2013 Assembly election, BJP's Ranjeet Singh had won from Gokalpur, an SC reserved constituency of north-east Delhi, by defeating Independent candidate Surender Kumar who later filed a complaint before the court alleging that Singh had faked his caste certificate.
The court, while allowing the appeal of Delhi Police to set aside the trial court order, said, further investigation in the case has been carried out by the SHO himself and the report of investigation has been already filed before the trial court.
The trial court in its order dated September 22, 2014, had directed personal appearance of Commissioner of Police, in order to report as to why the police was stalling investigation of the case after the police failed to file the compliance report and investigation report of the case.
In its order on September 16, 2014 the trial court had appointed an IPS officer as investigating officer of the case, to ensure independent and impartial probe after it found that despite lapse of a month from registration of FIR, police was not serious about the case.
In his complaint, Kumar had alleged that Singh had, in connivance with government officials, managed to secure caste certificate of Schedule Caste category, though he belonged to Other Backward Class (OBC).
The trial court had in August 2014, asked the police to lodge a FIR against Singh under section 420 (cheating) and 468 (forgery), 120 (B)(criminal conspiracy) of IPC.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 01 2014 | 2:47 PM IST

Next Story