Justice J B Pardiwala, two days ago, rejected the soft drink major's application seeking quashing of the 17 years old case.
The High Court did not accept its contention that delay in filing of the case caused it prejudice.
Also Read
The report of tests, received in January 1998, said the beverage was adulterated, with excessive impurity in the form of "floated feculent gelatin".
SMC filed a complaint against Pepsico and 11 of its employees in September 2000 before a magistrate's court.
Both the magistrate as well as the sessions judge refused to quash the complaint, so the company moved the High Court.
The company contended that there was a delay of more than two years in the filing of the case, and the tested sample might have changed with the lapse of time. But the High Court did not accept this argument.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)