Gujjar agitation: Rajasthan HC comes down heavily on state chief secretary, DGP

The court asked the officials to act immediately to remove all road and rail blockades

The Rajasthan High Court today rapped the Chief Secretary and the DGP for failing to arrest even a single Gujjar agitator and allowing people to suffer due to the "undemocratic" agitation which has crippled road and rail services in the state.

Asking the officials to act immediately to remove all road and rail blockades, the High Court directed the Chief Secretary and DGP to file an affidavit by tomorrow clarifying as to why action was not taken under the FIR registered against the agitators.

The court also asked them to give details of the losses caused to public and private property by the Gujjars' agitation over their demand for 5 percent reservation in government jobs.

"You (CS & DGP) being the head of bureaucracy and law and order machinery are not bound to be mere spectators of the political dialogue between the Gujjar agitators and the state government," a single judge bench of the court said.

"We cannot allow people to suffer for these undemocratic agitations. It seems that the both of you have gone senseless towards the plight of the public. We are making it clear in unambiguous terms to you that this court is keen to see that the blockades are removed immediately today itself with the train track and highway clear for movement overnight and we must be understood seriously while observing this," Justice R S Rathore said.

The observations and order came on a contempt petition pending against Gujjar leaders including Col. Kirori S. Bainsla since 2008 for violating orders of high court.

DRM Railway, Kota division and the Chief Security Officer, Railway police force (RPF) were also present before the court.

The court also expressed displeasure over the non-action of Chief Security Officer, RPF in protecting the fish plates of tracks removed in the affected region, crippling rail movement between Delhi and Jaipur.

"The state administration has lodged an FIR under stringent provisions for waging war against the state but not a single named person has been apprehended yet nor the investigation initiated," said Justice Rathore.