HC asks CBSE to revise marks awarded to all candidates in NEET

Image
Press Trust of India Allahabad
Last Updated : Aug 10 2017 | 11:22 PM IST
The Allahabad High Court today directed the CBSE to revise marks awarded to all candidates who had appeared in the NEET exam this year and decide the "merit/rank accordingly" in view of incorrect reply for one of the 180 objective type questions given in the answer key.
A Division Bench comprising Justice Tarun Agarwala and Justice Ashok Kumar passed the order while allowing a writ petition filed by Saumitra Gigodia who had scored 665 out of 720 marks in the National Eligibility cum Entrance Tests for admission to undergraduate medical courses and secured an all India rank of 137.
The petitioner had moved the court with the contention that he was "dismayed to see that the official answer to question no. 172 of test booklet Y was incorrect" following which he "submitted a representation against the OMR grading on payment of Rs 1,000".
Upon getting no response from the CBSE, the petitioner filed an RTI application which "remained pending" following which he filed the petition "praying for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to take a decision on the challenge made by the petitioner" and "to award 05 marks to the petitioner for question no. 172".
Allowing the petition, the court, however, remarked, "We find that question no. 172 in test booklet code Y could not be answered correctly by any candidate. We are, therefore, of the opinion that in the larger interest of administration the benefit should be extended not only to the petitioner but to all the candidates."
"The petitioner is entitled to be awarded 05 marks (04 marks for the question and 01 mark for minus marking). We also direct the CBSE to give appropriate marks to all the candidates in the like manner for question no. 172 and corresponding question given in other booklets," the court added.
"Even though the petitioner had not claimed refund of the prescribed fee for challenging a key answer, since we find that the challenge made by the petitioner was correct we are of the opinion that the petitioner is entitled to a refund of Rs 1,000. We accordingly issue a mandamus commanding the CBSE to refund Rs 1,000 to the petitioner at the earliest," the court ruled.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 10 2017 | 11:22 PM IST

Next Story