Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal issued the order after the court was informed the minor, who was granted bail in June by the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) here, was not traceable now.
The court was told that the notice issued to him were not served on his address in Bihar. Taking note of which, the court asked the investigating officer to find the juvenile and produce before it.
The police, meanwhile, in its status report to the court said they have conducted an enquiry about the date of birth of the 'child in conflict with law' (CCL) and according to the school record it was April 26, 1998.
The police response came in the backdrop of the court's notice issued to them and the two accused - Manoj Shah and the juvenile - while hearing a plea filed by the girl's mother against the transfer of the case to JJB on April 12.
The court posted the matter for November 30 for further hearing.
She said the ossification test conducted in February 2014, according to which the age of the accused was 20-22 years, was completely ignored by the trial court.
Even if the benefit of one year was granted to the accused, he would still be a major. His age was not found to be borderline, leaving no scope of doubt on his juvenility, Kaur, who was assisted by advocate Shilpa Dewan, submitted.
The petition contended that the sessions judge failed to complete the trial of the case, registered in 2013, within a year as mandated under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) but took three years to merely decide an application of juvenility of the accused.
Manoj, lodged in judicial custody, and the juvenile are accused of raping the girl and shoving off foreign objects in her private parts on April 15, 2013 in Gandhi Nagar area in East Delhi. The juvenile is facing trial before JJB.
The accused had fled after committing the crime, leaving the girl behind in Shah's room believing her to be dead. They were later arrested from Bihar.
The police said some foreign material - three pieces of a candle and one hair oil bottle - was taken out of the body of the victim and this was also proved by doctors during recording of their statements in the court.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
