A division bench comprising Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and justice Vinod Chandran criticised the petitioner Shelson Antony who approached the court seeking implementation of the Convention Centre project of the Lulu Group at Bolghatty.
The Lulu group had recently announced that they were withdrawing from the proposed project, which was to come up in a 20 acre area leased from the Cochin Port for 30 years following criticisms from the CPI(M)'s Ernakulam unit.
The bench orally observed that this was not a bonafide PIL. The intention of the petitioner is very clear.
The judges cautioned the petitioner that heavy cost will be imposed in such cases come up before the court.
Earlier also there was attempt to withdraw cases after publishing the contents of PIL in media.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
