The Bench of Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana held that "it cannot be a party to unlawful activities, including indecent representation of women and luring youngsters to the wrong path."
The court could not permit such programmes even by imposing conditions as they could be violated. If conditions are violated then damage caused cannot be restored, she said.
She pointed out that the petitioners had filed their petitions just one or two days after making representations to the officials concerned.
In some cases the representations had been sent from the High Court post office itself, she said.
The judge said some land owners had also raised objections, saying the programme organisers do not keep dustbins and hence those who attend such programmes litter the areas.
Some of them had also resorted to drunken brawls, leading to law and order situation, she said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
