A division bench, comprising Justice Dilip Gupta and Justice R N Kakkar, dismissed the PIL filed by Giriraj Kishore and two others, holding that the petition was "misconceived".
The petitioners had contended that there was a drought-like situation in Uttar Pradesh and holding such an event anywhere in the state would involve the use of a huge quantity of water for preparing the ground.
Moreover, the CSC added that while "no extra water" was going to be used for making the venue ready for the high-profile event, on the days when matches were scheduled, no water is sprinkled on the ground at all.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
