A division bench of the High Court, comprising Justices Rajendra Menon and A K Shrivastava, while disposing off the petition recently, observed that since the matter is directly related to revenue, the state government has to decide whether to ban liquor or not.
The court also told the petitioner, Madan Mohan Shakargayen, that he was free to make a representation to the state government in this regard.
The petitioner, a local activist, said in his PIL that Gujarat, Bihar and Kerala have banned liquor due to its bad effects on the society and hence it should be banned in Madhya Pradesh as well.
Heavily-drunk people pose a threat to women, the petitioner said citing cases in which drunkards had assaulted women.
Shakargayen told reporters today that he would approach the state government and request it to ban production, transport and sale of liquor in Madhya Pradesh by November 2016.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
