A bench comprising Chief Justice S K Kaul and Justice M Sundar raised these questions when one of the three PILs seeking a judicial inquiry into the circumstances leading to her death came up for hearing.
In his PIL, AIADMK worker P A Joseph has sought an inquiry by retired Supreme Court judges into "questionable incidents", including Jayalalithaa's sudden hospitalisation, reported recovery and the cardiac arrest resulting in her death.
The Judge had then issued notices to Central Government, Prime Minister's office, the state government, among others.
When the matter came up today, the judges wanted to know whether the petitioner and two others, including social activist Traffic Ramaswamy, who have filed similar PILs, had any locus standi to raise the issue in court.
The bench also wanted to know as to what extent details of treatment of people can be placed in the public domain merely because they held a public office.
The bench also sought to know whether there was any specific doubts regarding medical treatment given to Jayalalithaa and noted that the absence of an immediate family member (before the court) complicated the issue a bit.
Earlier, senior counsel K M Vijayan, who appeared for Joseph, said people were worried about the secrecy surrounding Jayalalithaa's death and that her leg was 'amputated' during treatment prior to her passing away.
Except for medical bulletins issued by the hospital, the government did not release any details of Jayalalithaa's health condition, he said.
Senior advocate R Gandhi, who appeared on behalf of another petitioner, Ghanasekaran, said even the state Governor was not allowed to visit Jayalalithaa when she was being treated.
Apollo Hospital's counsel P S Raman, however, said a complete discharge summary of Jayalalithaa was ready with the hospital and could be placed before the court. He denied there was any mystery behind her death.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
