HC quashes rape conviction as accused was minor at time of

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Jul 30 2018 | 5:21 PM IST

The Bombay High Court has quashed a sessions court order sentencing a man to 20 years in jail for raping a mentally challenged minor girl, holding that the accused was a minor at the time of the incident.

Justice A M Badar ordered for the accused, presently 21 years of age, to be released from jail and his case to be presented before the Juvenile Justice Board for passing appropriate orders in accordance with the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act.

The court was hearing an appeal filed by the man challenging an August 2016 order of a special Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) court convicting him, and two others, on charges of gangrape under Section 376 (D) of the IPC and the POCSO Act.

The court had sentenced the accused persons to 20 years in jail.

According to the prosecution, the man, along with two others, raped a mentally challenged minor girl living in their building in suburban Chembur.

The incident came to light when the girl's mother realised that she was pregnant following which an FIR was lodged.

The man in his appeal claimed that, at the time of the incident (March 15, 2013), he was only 16 years old and hence was entitled for benefit of provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.

Following this claim, the high court had, in March this year, directed the special POCSO court to conduct an enquiry and submit a report.

In June, the lower court submitted its report stating that the man was 16 years old at the time of the incident.

The high court, on July 27, accepted this report and directed for the trial court's conviction and sentencing order to be quashed and set aside.

"As the accused is found to be a juvenile on the date of commission of the offence, his case needs to be forwarded to the Juvenile Justice Board for passing appropriate orders.

The sentence passed by the trial court in the matter shall be deemed to have no effect," Justice Badar said in his order.

"The appellant/accused shall be released from prison forthwith and his case shall be forwarded to the Juvenile Justice Board," the court said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 30 2018 | 5:21 PM IST

Next Story