HC quashes TN Gov order on regularisation of illegal buildings

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Feb 10 2014 | 10:18 PM IST
Quashing a Tamil Nadu Government order extending the cut-off date for regularisation of unauthorised constructions upto 2007, Madras High Court today ticked off authorities for their lackadaisical attitude for the alarming and mushrooming growth of illegal structures.
Delivering the judgement on two PILs which sought to quash the October 31, 2012 order extending the cut-off date for regularisation of unauthorised developments made prior to July 1, 2007, it said the concerned authorities were required to act diligently and prevent recurrence of such kind of unlawful activities and deal with the violators with an iron hand.
First Bench comprising Chief Justice R K Agrawal and Justice M Sathyanarayanan, however, upheld the power of the state to introduce an amendment (section 113-C) to the Town and Country Planning Act to offer regularisation of unauthorised buildings.
The court observed that but for the lackadaisical attitude on the part of the concerned authorities, such an alarming and mushrooming growth of unauthorised and illegal constructions would not have come into place.
Petitioners K R Ramaswamy alias Traffic Ramaswamy and Citizen Consumer and Civic Action Group had challenged the order issued by the Housing and Urban Development Department to regularise unauthorised constructions upto 2007 based on the recommendation of a committee headed by retired Supreme Court Judge S Mohan.
The state government had set up the committee in June 2007 to suggest amendments to the Town and Country Planning Act for better regulation of development activities and it submitted its report after 33 sittings spread over years.
"While upholding the power of the state government to introduce/insert section 113-C, the court is of the considered view that the relevant material and important aspects have not been taken into proper consideration while framing guidelines and rules under the October 31, 2012 Government order," the judges said and quashed the order.
They suggested that the government may constitute a different committee or mandate the Mohan committee to go into all aspects once again before giving effect to Section 113-C of the Act.
The bench also said that it hoped and trusted that no further extension of cut-off date will be granted in future by the state government.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 10 2014 | 10:18 PM IST

Next Story