A division bench comprising Justice Subhrokamal Mukherjee and Justice Indrajit Chatterjee rejected the bail prayer of Agarwal, whose counsel claimed that he has been wrongly implicated.
Agarwal's counsel submitted that Sen's tryst with SEBI for alleged illegal money collection businesses began much before he came in contact with him.
They also said that reports submitted by SEBI with regard to the Saradha scam did not mention Agarwal's name.
The CBI counsel opposed the bail prayer claiming that there were evidence of his involvement and that investigation was on into the role of a section of SEBI officials.
The court then rejected Agarwal's bail prayer.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
