Dhumal had challenged the orders on the grounds that the prosecuting agency/Home Department had "misled" the trial court by not placing both the orders of the Governor of Himachal Pradesh and it had been passed without taking cognizance of the orders passed by the Governor on March 21, 2015.
On January 21, 2015, the then Governor of HP Urmila Singh had expressed opinion that sanction under section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act was not required while on March 21 GovernorKalyan Singh had reviewed the January 21 order and refused prosecution sanction against Dhumal.
Justice Rajiv Sharma heard the arguments and reserved the judgement.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
