HC restrains company from using trademark of another company

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Jan 04 2014 | 2:30 PM IST
The Bombay High Court has restrained Innova Cap Tab and its sister companies from manufacturing and marketing any medicinal preparation or product by using the mark 'MONTINAL', which is a registered trademark of Aristo Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd.
The order was passed by Justice S J Kathawala recently on a notice of motion taken out by Aristo Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd in a suit filed by it against Innova Cap Tab and others for infringing its trademark.
The Plaintiff has made out a prima facie case in their favour. The balance of convenience is also in their favour. In view thereof, pending the hearing and final disposal of the Suit, the defendents are restrained from infringing the trademark of Aristo Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd, said the Judge while disposing of the notice of motion.
The Plaintiff is engaged in manufacturing and sale of medicinal and pharmaceutical preparations. In December, 2002, the Plaintiff (then a Public Limited Company being Aristo Pharmaceuticals Limited) originally conceived and adopted a trademark being 'MONTINA', to be used for its products.
On December 31, 2002, the Plaintiff applied for and got the trademark MONTINA registered for medicinal and pharmaceutical preparations. Subsequently, the plaintiff became a private Ltd company.
The registration of the trademark was renewed on December 31, 2012, for a further period of ten years in favour of the Plaintiff. The registration of the trademark is thus valid and subsisting, the court noted.
In June last year, the Plaintiff commenced manufacturing of medical preparation in the form of syrup and tablets which was to be marketed under the trademark MONTINA. In August last, the Plaintiff commenced selling its products under the trademark MONTINA-L. Since then the Plaintiff is selling the said medicinal preparation in tablet as well as syrup form.
In September last year, the Plaintiff came across the Defendants' medicinal preparation sold under the identical trademark MONTINAL. On September 19, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a suit against the Defendants for infringement of its trademark and passing off the Defendants' goods as those of the Plaintiff's by the Defendants' use of trademark 'MONTINA'.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 04 2014 | 2:30 PM IST

Next Story