HC seeks RG's reply against its order to abolish POCSO court

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 17 2015 | 8:02 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today sought reply from its Registrar General's office on a PIL challenging its administrative order abolishing a special court set up under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act to hear child sexual abuse cases.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath asked the concerned authorities to file a short affidavit with regard to the issue raised in the petition within two weeks.
The court, which listed the matter for further hearing on September 23, was hearing a PIL filed by a lawyer who has contended that the high court's May 16 order, abolishing the POCSO court in Saket district court complex here, was "illegal and unconstitutional".
The petitioner claimed that the high court's decision has gone against its own earlier order constituting the special court under the POCSO Act.
The plea by advocate Gaurav Kumar Bansal also opposed the distribution of cases of the special court among other Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in the Saket district court.
"Abolition of the court of ASJ-01, district south, Saket, and distribution of the said court's POCSO cases is nothing but illegal, improper, unconstitutional and against the rule of law and law of the land," the petition contended.
"By abolishing the court of ASJ-01 (special court), the high court has not only violated its own order of March 16, but has also failed to implement the POCSO Act in letter and spirit," it has said.
It has also said that as the national capital has in recent times seen a spurt in offences against children, the abolition of the special court would cause "great hardship" to child victims of sexual abuse.
Recently in a related matter, the high court was told that there were 200-600 cases of sexual offences against children pending in each of the designated courts in the six district courts set up under the POCSO Act here and more public prosecutors were needed to handle them.
The city government too in an affidavit had told the court that there were 3,216 cases relating to sexual offences against children under POCSO Act pending before different sessions courts in the capital.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 17 2015 | 8:02 PM IST

Next Story