Referring to claims by the counsel for habeas corpus petitioners that the 20 MLAs were on a fast protesting their illegal detention, a division bench of justices C T Selvam and T Mathivanan said if true, it was a matter of serious concern, but added the court cannot act on mere submissions of counsel.
"(Counsel) K Balu submits that 20 of the MLAs are refusing food and drink owing to their illegal confinement. If true, the matter is one of serious concern.
The allegations were made by the counsel when the HCPs seeking to trace and set at liberty MLAs T Ramachandran and Geetha came up for hearing.
Petitioner M R Illavarasan submitted Ramachandran representing Kunnam constituency, was missing since attending a party meeting a few days ago. The MLA was not accessible by phone also, the petitioner, a voter of the constituency, said.
When the court sought to adjourn both the HCPs by two weeks, Balu said it could become too late.
He said contrary to the claim made by the Assistant Public Prosecutor before another bench yesterday that the 130-odd AIADMK MLAs were in the MLAs' Hostel here and were free to move around, media reports suggested they had been accommodated at a resort near here.
State Public Prosecutor Rajarathinam, representing the government, then admitted that its statement yesterday of MLAs being in the MLAs' Hostel here was 'incorrect', which was recorded by the bench.
Ramaswamy had submitted that the 130-odd AIADMK MLAs, who elected party General Secretary V K Sasikala as the Legislature Party leader recently, were under illegal detention and sought an urgent hearing.
Citing the 'categorical' submission by the APP, the bench had declined urgent hearing.
Rajarathinam today said no MLA was in the hostel, adding he would require time to ascertain their whereabouts.
A complaint in this regard had been lodged with police, he claimed, adding at least 20 MLAs were on a fast protesting their confinement and their lives were under threat.
He wanted the bench to direct the Kancheepuram district Superintendent of Police to inspect the resort and submit an interim report to the court.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
