HC show cause notice to Centre for filing false affidavit

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 09 2016 | 9:22 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today issued show cause notice to the Centre as to why contempt proceedings be not initiated against it for filing a "false affidavit" that did not receive any proposal for sanction of revision of pay scales of public prosecutors from Delhi government.
Justice J R Midha asked the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) to file its response by May 11 indicating who was the officer on whose instructions the "false affidavit" was filed.
The court issued the direction after it was informed by Delhi government counsel Rahul Mehra they have sent the cabinet note in December to the Lieutenant Governor approving hike in the salary of the prosecutors of trial courts here.
Mehra contended that the LG has put a stay on our proposal and sent it to the President.
He claimed the LG has stayed it on the ground that service matters do not lie in Delhi government's domain.
On April 19, the counsel for the central government had told the court that they have not received any proposal for sanction of revision of pay scales of public prosecutors from the Delhi government.
The Centre's response had come in the backdrop of its notice seeking its reply on a petition seeking contempt action against the Home Secretary for not complying with the court's September 9, 2015 order.
The court in its September 2015 order had directed the Delhi government that the decision to increase the pay scales of Delhi public prosecutors be implemented without any delay.
The contempt petition filed by Delhi Prosecutors Welfare Association alleged "deliberate and willful disobedience" on the part of the Centre and city government in complying with the court order.
The association, in its petition filed through advocate Ashish Dixit, had said assurances to the court by the Delhi government to provide Internet facilities to the prosecutors have also not been done.
"It is submitted that despite there being explicit directions by this court for implementing the cabinet decision dated September 1, 2015 the respondents (Centre and Delhi government) have till date not complied with the directions.
"The respondent 1 (Centre) and respondent 2 (Delhi government) have demonstrated an attitude which violates the majesty of this court. The respondents deliberately and willfully have not complied with the directions of this court," the petition said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 09 2016 | 9:22 PM IST

Next Story