HC to hear on May 7 Govt's contempt plea against Naveen Jindal

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 13 2015 | 7:43 PM IST
Delhi High Court today decided to hear on May 7 the government's plea seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against industrialist Naveen Jindal and one of his former employees who was caught recording court proceedings during a coal block allocation matter relating to his company.
A bench of justices B D Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva while agreeing to hear the matter also demanded an unconditional apology from the employee, Rajesh Sharma, who was a General Manager in Jindal Power Ltd (JPL).
The Coal Ministry in its application, filed through Central Government Standing Counsel Akshay Makhija, has alleged that Sharma was recording the court proceedings as well as "privileged communication" between government officials and lawyers.
The ministry alleged that Sharma was "obviously acting on direct instructions of Naveen Jindal" who was present in court at the time.
The Ministry submitted that Sharma never disclosed the purpose of his visiting the court nor where he worked, despite repeated enquiries from the bench, and instead lied that he was a businessman from Dwarka in south Delhi.
"In addition, he did not have a gate pass and had somehow managed to get inside/enter the court premises without a valid pass," the application said.
Despite these events "unfolding" before Jindal, he chose to remain a "silent spectator", it said.
It alleged that since Jindal chose to remain a silent spectator, it is "ex-facie evident" that Sharma was acting on his instructions.
Sharma was standing directly behind ministry officials and government lawyers who were carrying confidential files to be shown to the court and it is possible that he took pictures or videos of the files, the Ministry claimed.
The incident occurred on March 27 during the hearing of two matters relating to annulment of tender of two Chhattisgarh mines - Gare Palma IV/2 and IV/3 - for which JPL had put in the winning bid.
The bench had expressed concern over the security lapse in the court premises as Sharma was allowed to enter the main building without an entry pass, saying he could have been a "terrorist".
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 13 2015 | 7:43 PM IST

Next Story