Allowing a petition filed by the corporation, Justice R Suresh Kumar recently set aside an order of the labour court, Salem, which modified the TNSTC order and directed it to reinstate him.
The judge pointed out that it was an essential service and if the corporation's employees were in the habit of being unauthorisedly absent, it was very difficult to render it for the benefit of the public.
Ramalingam was an employee of the TNSTC. As he was unauthorisedly absent starting May 28, 1998 for several days, a charge memo was issued and after examining his explanation, an inquiry was conducted and he was dismissed.
The TNSTC challenged this in the high court.
After perusing the records, the judge said it showed that Ramalingam almost every year was unauthorisedly absent for some days or months.
Such unauthorised absence on his part was not explained and therefore, minor punishments were awarded, the judge said.
In spite of this, the employee had not changed his attitude and hence it showed that Ramalingam had the habit of being unauthorisedly absent for months or weeks together without a valid reason, Justice Suresh Kumar said.
These aspects were not properly considered and appreciated by the labour court and the court felt that the findings and conclusions given by it were without reason, the judge added.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
