The US has been pitching for greater Indo-US cooperation in the strategically key Indo-Pacific region where China has been ramping up its military presence.
Jonathan N Stivers, commissioner, US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, told a Congressional committee during a hearing on China's One Belt One Road strategy that India should become a central component of the Asia-Pacific strategy.
"India shares our democratic values and we have overlapping strategic interests, particularly concerns about China's policies in the region. The Trump administration is on the right track with the "Indo-Pacific" region terminology and the resuscitation of the Quadrilateral Dialogue with democratic partners Japan, Australia and India last week," Stivers said.
In addition, the US should assist India with gaining membership in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum, support Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 'Act East' policy, and help India with its own domestic development challenges, Stivers said.
"Of all those who live in extreme poverty in the world, 33 percent live in India. India's health, regional connectivity, and energy and electricity sectors must make progress if any Indo-Asia-Pacific strategy is to be successful," he said.
Stivers said the Asia-Pacific region, including India, is absolutely vital to the security and prosperity of the American people.
It is the most dynamic and one of the youngest and fastest growing regions of the world with four of the five projected highest growth rate countries: China, India, Indonesia, and the Philippines. In the next five years nearly half of all growth outside the US will happen in Asia. By 2050, the region's share of world GDP will double and it will be half of the world's GDP, he said.
"BRI is a continuation of a favourite Chinese strategic gambit that to win without war, one must weaken the adversary's resistance by all means available. In the case of BRI, opposition is weakened through large-scale investment (often without contingencies) and extensive informational, even propaganda, campaigns," he said.
Kamphausen said the Chinese BRI is predatory.
China's loans are in reality state subsidies for Chinese companies.
They are primarily used to pay Chinese companies to build the infrastructure with Chinese materials, using Chinese workers, he said.
Only 23 per cent of the Chinese aid funding falls under the OECD's definition of aid.
By contrast, 93 per cent of US spending falls into the category, he said.
"Chinese loans are mostly given to projects without a development intent and that have a grant element of under 25 per cent, which reflects China's overall intention to promote its commercial interests overseas," he added.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
