"Let the government announce a commission to resolve all land-related issues," Jharkhand Vikas Morcha (Prajatantrik) Legislature Party leader Pradip Yadav said.
Debating over his Cut Motion on the Budget allocations for Revenue, Land Reforms, Art, Culture, Sport and Youth Affairs departments, Yadav sought to know from the state government about the "result" of the special investigation team (SIT) it had instituted a year back to look into land deals in violation of SPT and CNT.
Claiming that a couple of amendments in land acquisition rules had drastically reduced the compensation amount in the three districts, Yadav wondered how the poor land holders were "losing" land, despite 90 per cent of land being protected under CNT/SPT Acts.
"Let industrialists come, but with adequate compensation to the people as they suffer from industrial pollution and displacement," Yadav said.
Hemant Soren asked how the government took a decision on coal mining by a private company in Godda.
Expressing concern over acquisition of land in the Santhal Pargana, Soren said the people who lost land could not purchase it under the SPT Act in the districts of the region.
"It is a conspiracy to displace tribals/moolvasis (natives), despite pledging to protect the tribals under the Constitution," Soren argued.
Citing example as to how the tribal labour force increased following acquisition of farm land, he demanded immediate stopping of land acquisition and suggested acquiring land on lease for 30 years and a review thereafter.
Congress MLA Sukhdeo Singh said the government's introduction of the Single Window System was good for the industrialists, but what about the poor "without a land policy."
He also alleged that the R&R policy of the government was not clear.
Claiming that 9.8 lakh acres of land under the Bhoodan movement of Vinoba Bhave still remained undistributed in the state, CPI(ML-Liberation) MLA Raj Kumar Yadav said if the government wanted to contain Maoist activities, it should initiate distribution of those land to the landless.
The minister could not touch upon the issues raised by the Opposition as his reply was cut short midway due to the Opposition's objections to the nomenclature of a sports club.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
