Water Resources Minister MB Patil made the statement in the Assembly as JD(S) demanded House resolution, by entering the Well of the House.
Responding to the Minister's statement, Speaker Kagodu Thimmappa said a notice has to be given before moving a resolution.
As Patil said he will go by the procedures, JD(S) members, who were in the well of the House, went back to their seats.
BJP, which is opposed to any such resolution, has instead suggested that the Congress government in the state should convince their party colleagues in Goa and Maharashtra about out of court settlement to the issue.
The Kalasa-Banduri Nala (diversion) project, which will utilise 7.56 tmcft of water from the inter-state Mahadayi river, is being undertaken by Karnataka to improve drinking water supply to the twin cities of Hubballi-Dharwad and the districts of Belagavi and Gadag.
It involves building barrages across Kalasa and Banduri, tributaries of Mahadayi river, in order to divert 7.56 TMC to Malaprabha river which adhers to the drinking water needs of the twin cities.
Earlier Goa government had rejected Karnataka's attempt for out of court settlement of the dispute stating that the people of the state felt it was more prudent to settle the dispute through the Tribunal.
The minister said a meeting of all political parties and stake holders had been convened by the Chief Minister Siddaramaiah to discuss the future course of action.
As Konareddy demanded that a resolution be passed, the Speaker said he will have to look into it as the House resolution should also get a respectable response.
Intervening, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah said for a resolution there should be unanimity of the House and all its members. Pointing out that BJP is not in favour of it, he questioned the party's commitment in solving the issue.
accusing him of politicising the issue. They also advised him to convince opposition parties in Maharashtra and Goa.
Minister Patil said according to rules a resolution cannot be passed regarding the matters pending before the court or tribunal, "but we can pass a resolution seeking PM's intervention."
As BJP members opposed this, Speaker Thimmappa said "come to a conclusion on passing a resolution during the meeting called by the Chief Minister on April 2."
Confusion prevailed for some time as JD(S) leader H D Revanna said the Minister has already moved the resolution
The Speaker then directed him to give the notice on it first.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
