"Tamil Nadu has a different Act or an amended Act in place since January 5, 2015. It has been almost 7-8 months, very few people knew about it. Tamil Nadu has, in fact, amended the 2013 Act (Land Act) and it applies to their state," Panagariya said in an interview to CNBC TV18.
He also said that the Act got the Presidential assent and "other states could follow the same strategy".
Panagariya said that the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, was a bit draconian and he had suggested the same to the government even before assuming the office at NITI Aayog.
"I was one of the very strong advocates even before I came to the NITI Aayog, that the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, was a bit draconian for the simple reason that some of the very important cases where public purpose is actually at stake, the acquisition would take at least 4-5 years," he said.
"So I advocated myself before reforming the Act and also advocated actually reforming the Act centrally because one state at a time is a longer process," he added.
His comments assume significance as the NDA government's efforts to amend the Land Acquisition Act have faced stiff opposition. Earlier, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had also advised the states to frame their own Land Act with the Centre's approval.
The view of having separate land laws of different states emerged after the meeting of the Governing Council of NITI Aayog with chief ministers in July this year.
"Now for the future, Tamil Nadu doesn't have to come back to the central government," Panagariya said.
The NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman said other states can follow the Tamil Nadu model, however, they still would have to come to the central government for the Presidential assent.
"But my own speculation is that once the assent has been given to Tamil Nadu or to one state, I don't think the central government can deny the same thing to the other states," he said.
Panagariya also said that he has advised Maharashtra and Rajasthan on the land acquisition act.
"I have passed on the advice to the Maharashtra Chief Minister and he has made a public statement that he is actually going to follow that rule...I have also suggested the same to the Chief Minister of Rajasthan. So, I expect that they would be working on it," he added.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)