Land Bill panel: Members oppose submission by pvt firm MD

Say private individuals cannot be allowed to push their 'agenda' before the parliamentary panel

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 17 2015 | 1:23 AM IST
Members from Opposition parties on Tuesday expressed reservations over the representative of a private firm being allowed to make a submission before the Joint Committee of Parliament that is going into the contentious land acquisition Bill.

As it met for the fifth day to hear the views of stakeholders, some of the Opposition party members strongly objected to the panel calling “private individuals with their own agenda” for the meeting, sources said.

One of the members questioned why they should listen to views of people with “vested interests”, saying that the particular company had interest in building construction activities, the sources added.

ALSO READ: Land Bill: NGOs, farmer organisations hit out at govt

Members said they have no objection to individuals appearing before the Parliamentary panel who represent credible organisations, but private individuals cannot be allowed to push their “agenda”.

The Joint Committee on the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Second Amendment) Bill, 2015, headed by SS Ahluwalia today called representatives from organisations like Foundation for Democratic Reforms, Bhoomi Adhikar Andolan, Sree Samayaa, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, PRS Legislative Research and an individual Dhanush Kumar.

Two young law students Aditya Manubarwala and Shardool Kulkarni also submitted their views before the panel.

While the first two submissions went on normally, members objected when the Managing Director of Sree Samayaa, a private limited company from Mumbai, began expressing his views in favour of the contentious Bill.

The MD of Sree Samayaa was cut short by with Congress, Trinamool Congress, Left and BJD members being the ones who opposed him.

The opposition members also wanted the government to spell out its stand on the land Bill issue since the matter has now been referred to a parliamentary panel. They asked Ahluwalia to find out what the government's view is on the matter now.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 17 2015 | 12:23 AM IST

Next Story