Lissy Priyadarshan asked to appear before Ker HC on Nov 16

Image
Press Trust of India Kochi
Last Updated : Jan 21 2013 | 5:46 PM IST

Justice B P Ray issued the direction on a contempt plea filed by N D Varkey, who claims to be Lissy's father.

The judge rejected the plea of Lissy's counsel that the media was "harassing" her and that was the reason for her non-appearance.

Justice Ray ordered Lissy's presence, terming as "unbecoming" her failure to appear before it earlier to respond to the contempt's plea.

The court observed that she had not been properly advised and granted her another opportunity to appear on Friday.

Lissy, a former Malayalam actress, had been asked by the court first to appear on November 12 which was later adjourned to today. But she failed to appear today too.

Her counsel submitted that she had remitted Rs 1.15 lakh to a district collector as directed towards the arrears of compensation to Varkey. The court directed the collector to disburse the amount to the petitioner.

Lissy had remitted the amount on November 6 through her counsel to the collector who is the appellate tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act.

Justice Ray had earlier dispensed with the personal appearance of Ernakulam District collector, P A Sheik Pareeth, who is the second respondent in the case.

Lissy maintained that she has not violated the court's order and had not committed contempt.

According to her, she has no knowledge of Varkey except that he had filed the case against her. She said she and her mother had lived for years without any help from him. She said her baptism and SSLC certificates and Passport would show that his claims were not valid.

Earlier, Justice Ray had opined that parties have committed prima facie contempt and directed to showcause why suitable punishment should not be ordered.

The sub-divisional magistrate had directed Lissy to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs 4,500 and Rs 1,000 for Varkey's medical needs. This was challenged by Lissy by filing a review petition before the collector. The petitioner then approached the court which directed Lissy to pay maintenance.

When she failed to comply with the order, the contempt petition was filed.

  

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 14 2012 | 2:15 PM IST

Next Story