Participating in a discussion before passing a bill to hike the salary of Supreme Court and high court judges, several members spoke about accountability of judges and raised concerns over judiciary transgressing into the legislature's jurisdiction.
A law setting up the National Judicial Appointments Commission passed by both Houses of Parliament unanimously was struck down as "unconstitutional" by the Supreme Court in 2016. The law sought to overturn the over two decade old collegium system.
"If the polity of the country decide to speak in one voice, we'll find a way out...I am getting the sense of the House," he said referring to views that the collegium system should be overturned.
He said before 1993, when government had a greater say in judicial appointments, the system had produced some of the finest judges of India.
Kalyan Banerjee (TMC) demanded that members of Parliament across political spectrum should approach the Supreme Court and say that "it is not your function" to legislate.
"Legislation should be left to Parliament...Day by day the conflict is coming up and unless it is stopped by the judiciary, in 10-15 years there will be a direct conflict between judiciary and Parliament," Banerjee said.
Deputy Speaker M Thambidurai, who was in the Chair, too said that the function of judiciary is to implement the law. "They can't legislate the law".
Responding to questions raised by members regarding the memorandum of procedure -- a document to guide appointment and postings of judges of the apex court and the 24 high courts -- Prasad said it is "a work in progress" where the government is pressing for greater screening and scrutiny of candidates being considered fr appointment as judges.
Members also demanded that the salary of MPs too should be hiked as well as MPLAD funds as they are accountable to the people of the country.
P Ravindra Babu (TDP) too demanded that the salary of MPs should be hiked.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
