The Delhi Police said the woman had first approached them for registration of a rape case against Patel, but later retracted her allegations.
The submissions were made by the police in an Action Taken Report (ATR) filed in pursuance to the court order asking them to examine the case since when the woman had approached it for registration of FIR against Patel.
The MP, in the meantime, had also approached the police which arrested the woman, who is now in judicial custody.
The police, in the ATR, said that in the complaints filed against others as well, the woman had later retracted her claims since her intention was only to extort money.
The counsel appearing for the woman claimed that the politician was misusing the police and she has been arrested in a false case filed by the MP.
Advocate Shahid Anwar, appearing for the woman, told the court that he needed time to verify this fact from his client.
The court directed the counsel to file the response after discussing with the woman and posted the matter for further hearing on May 18.
Meanwhile, Special Judge Hemani Malhotra extended till May 26 the judicial custody of the woman, arrested on Patel's complaint that he was honey-trapped and blackmailed by her.
"He (Patel) claimed that he was honey trapped on March 28 and two days later my client demanded money. But he had filed the complaint in this regard after a month. However, the FIR says there was no delay in filing the complaint," the woman's counsel said.
He also alleged that the MP had filed the FIR after he got to know that the court has sought an ATR on her complaint alleging rape.
The court had last month sought an ATR from the SHO of North Avenue Police Station here on the allegations of rape by the woman lawyer against the MP.
She had alleged that she was raped by the politician several times at his official residence and other places and added that the MP had threatened her of dire consequences if she did not maintain silence.
However, the woman was arrested by the Delhi Police on May 2 on the MP's complaint that the woman had honey-trapped him and demanded Rs five crore. He had alleged that he was drugged and obscene videos and photos were shot by the woman who had threatened him to file a rape case.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
