Mulayam, Akhilesh withdraw pleas from SC after vacating official residences

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 12 2018 | 6:55 PM IST

Former Uttar Pradesh chief ministers Mulayam Singh Yadav and Akhilesh Yadav today withdrew their pleas from the Supreme Court seeking time to vacate their official residences allotted to them when they held office, saying they have already moved out.

When the petitions came up for hearing before a bench of Justices Arun Mishra and Abdul Nazeer, the counsel, appearing for the father-son duo, said these pleas should be disposed of as they have already vacated their official residences on June 2 following the apex court order.

The top court had on May 7 held that the former chief ministers of UP cannot retain government accommodation after demitting office, saying a chief minister was on par with a common man once his or her term ends.

The court had struck down an amendment in a state legislation allowing former chief ministers to retain government bungalows even after demitting office.

After the verdict, the Samajwadi Party (SP) leaders had on May 28 moved the apex court seeking "appropriate time" for vacating their official residences at Lucknow which were allotted by the UP government.

While the plea filed by Mulayam Singh Yadav had sought sufficient time from the apex court to make arrangements for alternate accommodation, Akhilesh had urged the top court to consider the security of his family.

The top court's May 7 order was passed on a petition filed by an NGO Lok Prahari challenging the amendments made by the erstwhile Akhilesh Yadav government to the 'UP Ministers (Salaries, Allowances and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1981'.

In its order, it had observed that a Chief Minister cannot continue to occupy public property like government bungalows which belong to the people of the country and said the provision had the effect of creating a separate class of citizens for conferment of benefits by way of distribution of public property on the basis of the previous public office held by them.

The NGO had also challenged another UP law of 2016 called 'The Allotment of Houses under Control of the Estate Department Bill-2016' to regulate the allotment of government accommodation to trusts, journalists, political parties, Speaker and Deputy Speaker of legislative assembly, judicial officers and government officials.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 12 2018 | 6:55 PM IST

Next Story