Mounting a sharp attack on Congress, Union Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad accused "vested interests" within the UPA government of protecting Naik as he showed a purported reply by then I&B Minister Manish Tewari in the Lok Sabha in 2012 where he had named Naik's Peace TV as among 24 illegal foreign channels whose contents were not conducive to India's security environment.
He asked Congress why it did not return the donation given to it in 2011 when its own government had expressed security concern with regard to Naik's TV channel.
At a press conference, Prasad also quoted from the then Minority Affairs Minister K Rahman Khan's letter to Tewari in February 2013 in which he termed Naik as a "renowned Islamic scholar" and sought the government's protection for him from campaigns run by a regional channel and a Hindu group.
"Those lobbying for him were at high positions in Congress. Why should not this apprehension be raised that this Rs 50 lakh was a bribe to powers that be to shelter its illegal, anti-national activities," he said.
hypocrisy and disregard for national security" is a matter of shame and dismay.
Asked what the NDA government will do regarding the matter, he said a proper enquiry will be conducted.
"There cannot be a more shameful thing for the Congress to say that it had received money and returned...Whether the money has been returned or not is a matter between them. But what is source of money? Is there a violation of law? It amounts to playing with the national security."
"Congress party in the past has hesitated in acting against terrorists for votes but it is shameful that an organisation abetting terrorism had access to the top echelons of the organisation," he alleged.
"A then minister of government of India is giving communal colour to apprehensions over terrorism," Prasad said.
He also sought to know from the opposition party if the Gandhi family-run RGF was duly registered under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) and was it allowed to accept contributions from another NGO.
Prasad also rejected the Congress' claim that the donation was given to Rajiv Gandhi Charitable Trust (RGCT), saying it is an offshoot of the main body (RGF).
Targeting Naik's NGO Islamic Research Foundation, he said it cannot distribute money like alms to other NGOs and asked if it had obtained prior permission from the Home Ministry for donative a big sum like Rs 50 lakh to RGF.
The Union Minister referred to the terrorists allegedly influenced by Naik to target the televangelist.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
