Hailing India's decision regarding the UNHRC resolution as a "diplomatic move", Natchiappan, in a statement here said, "If India would have supported the resolution, it may have paved the way for the Chinese to carry out rehabilitation works in Tamil-dominated areas, which are hitherto done by India.
He further added that the decision to abstain from UNHRC resolution would help to improve the livelihood of the Lankan Tamils in the island nation as well as the migrants.
New Delhi's decision to abstain from voting in United Nations Human Rights Council has drawn all-round flak from political parties and outfits in Tamil Nadu with Chidambaram himself admitting that India should have supported the US-backed move, albeit a 'watered down one.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
