NCDRC asks Sahara Group company to pay Rs 1.11 crore to couple

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 25 2017 | 6:57 PM IST
A Sahara Group company has been directed by the apex consumer body to refund Rs 1.11 crore for its failure to give possession of a bungalow in one of its housing projects near Indore to a home-buyer.
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) rejected the contention of Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd (SICCL) that it could not handover the property to an Indore-based couple due to certain clearances having not been given to the company.
The consumer body, which also imposed a litigation cost of Rs 10,000 on the firm, said there was "no justification" for the "abnormal delay" of four years on the part of SICCL which had not delivered the bungalow to the couple since the expiry of the due date in 2011.
"Though a bald averment was made that there was delay in obtaining requisite clearances, there is no evidence to substantiate it. There is no evidence as to on which date the statutory clearances were applied and on which date, the same were granted.
"It is also not known what were the reasons for statutory clearances not being granted in time. If the delay in grant of statutory clearances occurred on account of deficiencies or short-comings on the part of respondents (SICCL and Sahara Prime City Ltd), it cannot take any advantage of such delays.
According to the complaint filed by the couple - Sanjay Kumar Airen and Anita Airen - they were allotted a residential bungalow in Sahara Prime City Ltd and SICCL's housing project Sahara City Homes at Agra-Bombay Bypass Road near Indore on May 28, 2008 after a payment of Rs 1.11 crore.
The possession was to be delivered within 38 months from the date of the allotment, that is by July 28, 2011. However, they did not get it till 2015, it said.
The NCDRC, while noting that SEBI-Sahara refund case is already in Supreme Court, also said, "If there is an embargo on disbursement of the cash available with the SICCL or the amount which it has to deposit in SEBI Sahara Account, the SICCL will make disbursement only subject to the Supreme Court granting permission for such disbursement, to complainants."
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court tightened the noose around Sahara group chief Subrata Roy while refusing to extend time beyond February 6 for him to deposit Rs 600 crore in SEBI's account, saying he would have to go to jail in case of a default.
According to SEBI, Sahara has already paid Rs 10,918 crore out of Rs 24,029 crore raised from investors.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 25 2017 | 6:57 PM IST

Next Story