A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Chander Shekhar, however, said the issue of whether a common symbol be given to registered and unrecognised parties required elaborate hearing and elucidation before a decision is taken.
The court listed the matter for next hearing on July 19.
"Issue/grant of a common election symbol would require and mandate comments/objections from different stakeholders. The process and award of a common symbol is not an easy and simple exercise, for others could have objection and reservation on allotment from the free symbols.
It said the principle of balance of convenience mandates that the poll as fixed by the authorities should be conducted smoothly without any obstruction and hindrance.
The court's order has come on a plea filed by Swaraj India seeking setting aside of a single judge order, by which their request for allotment of a common symbol to its candidates to contest for the 272 MCD wards here was declined.
Swaraj India had sought quashing of the panel's March 14, 2017 notification and an April 2016 order which had said that the nominees of such parties would be treated as independent candidates for allotment of symbols.
The party had also sought stay on the election, which the bench declined observing that the same is "unacceptable".
"We cannot ignore the practical and functional problems which would arise. These would hinder and create obstacles in conduct of free and fair election in smooth manner," it said, adding that today was the last date for filing nomination of the candidates.
Disallowing the request for common symbol, the bench in its 10-page interim order also noted that 31 registered unrecognised parties and 11 unregistered parties have made identical requests.
"Any interjection and interim direction in favour of the appellant to allot a common symbol would result in spate of similar prayers before the state election commission or writ petitions before the Court on identical lines," it said.
The single judge had on March 29 said since the plea was filed after the polling process was underway, it was very late in the day for the court to interfere.
Swaraj India was floated in October last year by Yadav and advocate Prashant Bhushan, who were expelled from the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) after they questioned Arvind Kejriwal's leadership.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
