No one can interfere with idol theft cases probe in TN: HC

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Jun 27 2018 | 10:10 PM IST

The Madras High Court today made it clear that no one can interfere with the probe into idol theft cases in Tamil Nadu being carried out by a team headed by a senior IPS officer appointed by it.

The observation was made after the officer submitted that the court's directions over the idol theft cases were not being followed properly and he was being asked to attend review meetings and share case diaries by officials.

"We will never permit violation of the order of the court and any violation will be viewed seriously," Justice R Mahadevan said after hearing IGP Pon Maickavel, appointed by the court to investigate theft of ancient idols of various temples in Tamil Nadu over a period of time.

The court was hearing two petitions seeking transfer of investigation into all pending cases of idol thefts to the CB-CID police.

In an interim order in July last year, the judge had taken a serious view of theft of ancient idols and expressed anguish that the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments department, administering a large number of temples in the state, had failed to protect the antique items and other valuables.

Transferring all pending idol theft cases to a court in Kumbakonam for speedy disposal, he had directed Manickavel to continue the probe despite his transfer then from the idol wing police.

During the hearing today, Manickavel complained that under the guise of review meetings, he was being asked by officials to disclose details with regard to the investigations and produce the case diaries.

He also complained that the directions given by the court were not implemented properly and some officials working in his team had been transferred to various places.

Advocate 'Elephant' Rajendran, one of the petitioners, alleged the government had not implemented the directions given by the high court in its July 21, 2017 order and that officials were dragging the matter because they were waiting for the retirement of Manickavel this November.

The Commissioner of the HR&CE R Jaya, who was present in the court, submitted she was not regarded as the chief of the department by the Idol wing police team.

The judge then stated that as the Commissioner of the department, her rights cannot be taken away.

Additional Advocate General P H Aravind Pandian submitted that the IG can be called to attend review meetings held by the higher officials and asked to give details of the action taken by him in the cases related to idol theft.

The judge posted the case to July 11 for further hearing.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 27 2018 | 10:10 PM IST

Next Story