The move is significant as it comes in the backdrop of corruption allegations in various PPP projects in the past.
The private sector has so far been resisting the move but the committee's argument is that since public money is being spent even in PPP projects, it needs to be safeguarded.
The PAC headed by Congress leader K V Thomas has decided to call a meeting of the full CAG, most likely this month, after which it will also be calling representatives from ministries.
The issue was vigorously debated at a recent meeting of the PAC.
Under the PPP mode, the project is implemented based on a contract or concession agreement between a government or statutory entity on the one side and a private sector company on the other side for delivering an infrastructure service on payment of user charges.
Former PAC Chairman Murli Manohar Joshi, a veteran BJP leader, had earlier also said that the CAG hould be given powers to look into the functioning of PPP projects, societies and NGOs.
His argument was that every single paisa going through the budget should be looked into by the CAG.
The PAC headed by Thomas has now decided to discuss in detail the manner in which the CAG can examine transactions in PPP projects and how the CAG can be technically assisted to do so.
is that the CAG can at best only look into the profit part.
"They also argue that only the ministry can look into the PPP projects and not the CAG. There is also a view that the move to involve CAG into the scrutiny of PPP projects will discourage foreign investment. That is why we have decided to call a full CAG meeting to discuss all these aspects," the source said.
In a report presented in the Lok Sabha in 2014, the CAG had made a case for comprehensive audit of public-private partnership projects by it. The auditor wanted the government to insert relevant clauses in PPP contracts for this purpose.
The same year, the CAG had made some adverse comments about PPP projects in some key infrastructure sectors including the Mumbai airport and several railways projects.
In 2011 earlier, the then Planning Commission had, however, voiced reservations against CAG scrutiny on the role of private sector players implementing the Public Private Partnership (PPP) projects.
The bill sought to replace the CAG Act, 1971 and expand its scope. However, it could not take off.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
