Pak SC dismisses NAB's "frivolous" petition against Sharifs' hearing suspension

Image
Press Trust of India Islamabad
Last Updated : Sep 17 2018 | 5:30 PM IST

The Supreme Court of Pakistan Monday rejected as "frivolous" the petition of the country's top anti-graft body against Islamabad High Court's decision to hear the appeals of jailed former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, his daughter and son-in-law against their conviction in a corruption case.

The apex court also imposed a fine of 20,000 Rupees on the National Accountability Bureau (NAB).

Sharif, his daughter Maryam and son-in-law Muhammad Safdar are serving jail terms of 10-years, seven years and one year respectively in the Adiala Jail after the accountability court convicted them on July 6 over the family's ownership of four luxury flats in London through illegal means.

The anti-graft watchdog on Sunday moved the Supreme Court against the Islamabad High Court's decision accepting Sharifs' Avenfield verdict suspension pleas for hearing.

"The Supreme Court rejected a 'frivolous' NAB plea blocking the Sharifs' Avenfield verdict suspension pleas before the Islamabad High Court (IHC) and fined the anti-grant watchdog Rs 20,000," The Express Tribune reported.

The petition submitted in the apex court by NAB Chairman Javed Iqbal stated that Sharif family members' appeals against their conviction in the Avenfield property case and their bail pleas cannot be heard simultaneously.

According to the petition, the high court did not send the NAB a notice before accepting the Sharif family's petition for hearing.

"The high court cannot rule on the Sharif family's petition without listening to NAB's perspective," the petition said.

The NAB chief said in his petition that ruling on the suspension application is not in the high court's jurisdiction and thus the IHC should be stopped from hearing the petition.

Meanwhile, an Islamabad High Court bench hearing the Sharifs' pleas expressed surprise over the NAB challenging their September 10 order.

Justice Athar Minallah said that the NAB had placed no objection to the order and has now challenged it before the apex court.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 17 2018 | 5:30 PM IST

Next Story