Patients unable to give free consent too have right to refuse treatment: SC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 09 2018 | 9:30 PM IST
The Supreme Court, which recognised the right of terminally-ill persons to execute a living will, today said the right was also available to those who were unable to give their free consent to end life.
The top court held that when the right of an adult person who expresses his desire for medical treatment can be regarded to be flowing from Article 21 of the Constitution then the patient's right who is unable to express his view cannot be outside Article 21.
"When an adult person having mental capacity to take a decision can exercise his right not to take treatment or withdraw from treatment, the above right cannot be negated for a person who is not able to take an informed decision due to terminal illness or being a persistent vegetative state," Justice Ashok Bhushan said in his separate judgement.
Justice Bhushan, who concurred with the chief justice and other judges, said that the right to refuse treatment flowed from Article 21 (Right to life and liberty) of the Constitution and hence this was available to those suffering from a disease and incompetent to execute a living will.
Dealing with the mechanism for refusal to take treatment in case of such persons, Justice Bhushan said there are other stakeholders like the family members and the doctors treating the terminally-ill patient who can help the patient in this situation.
"We also are of the opinion that in cases of incompetent patients who are unable to take an informed decision, it is in the best interests of the patient that the decision be taken by competent medical experts and that such decision be implemented after providing a cooling period at least of one month to enable aggrieved person to approach the Court of Law.
"The best interest of the patient as determined by medical experts shall meet the ends of justice. The medical team by taking decision shall also take into consideration the opinion of the blood relations of the patient and other relevant facts and circumstances," Justice Bhushan said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 09 2018 | 9:30 PM IST

Next Story