Peter was part of conspiracy from start: CBI in Sheena murder case

The prosecutor said for two years before the murder Indrani and Sheena were not on talking terms

Indrani Mukerjea, Peter Mukerjea, Sheena Bora, Murder
Peter Mukerjea after being produced by the CBI at the Esplanade court in Mumbai in connection with Sheena Bora murder case. Photo: Kamlesh Pednekar.
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Dec 21 2016 | 8:57 AM IST
The Central Bureau  of Investigation (CBI) on Tuesday told a Mumbai court that former media baron Peter Mukerjea, accused in the Sheena Bora murder case, did not come to Mumbai with his wife Indrani in April 2012, because he feared it would show his complicity.

The court is hearing arguments on framing of charges in Sheena murder case.

Prosecutors Bharat Badami and Kavita Patil on Tuesday said Indrani came to Mumbai on April 23, 2012, a day before murder. Peter came three days later, because he feared he would be arrested if the murder ever came to light and it was seen that he was with Indrani at the time.

Indrani was informing Peter about every step taken by her in the meantime, Badami said.

After Sheena got engaged with Rahul, Peter's son from first wife Shabnam Singh, only Shabnam and Sheena's father Siddharth Das blessed the couple but not Peter, the prosecutor said, because "Peter was unhappy about this relationship".

Indrani spoke to Peter on phone even from a spot she identified for disposal of Sheena's body, which "cannot be a coincidence", Badami said, adding that "he (Peter) was part and parcel of the conspiracy".

The prosecutor said for two years before the murder Indrani and Sheena were not on talking terms. But on the day of the murder, Indrani invited her to dinner.

Peter told his house help (after the murder) that "Indrani has separated Sheena and Rahul", which "discloses that Peter had full knowledge of murder," said Badami.

Peter never lodged any missing person complaint after Sheena disappeared, the prosecutor said.

By killing Sheena, her daughter from relationship with Siddharth Das, Indrani ensured that she did not face any embarrassment due to Rahul marrying Sheena, and all the properties would go to Vidhie (Indrani's daughter with former husband and co-accused Sanjeev Khanna), Badami said.

CBI today finished its arguments. Defence is likely to begin their arguments on Thursday.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 21 2016 | 8:42 AM IST

Next Story