Plea in SC challenging new law on appointment of judges

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 05 2015 | 8:30 PM IST
A petition was today filed in the Supreme Court seeking quashing of the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act, 2014 which ends the two-decade-old collegium system of judges themselves selecting and appointing judges for higher judiciary.
The petition filed by senior advocate Bhim Singh challenging the legality and constitutional validity of the NJAC Act, 2014 and the constitution (121st Amendment) Bill, 2014, comes barely a week after President Pranab Mukherjee accorded assent to them.
Singh, who is also the chief of Jammu and Kashmir National Panthers Party, termed them as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and contended the new system will result in excessive dominance of the executive in appointment of judges to the superior judiciary and recommendation of the Chief Justice of India would be reduced to mere suggestion.
The petition said the new process is likely to jeopardize the appointment of judges in higher courts resulting into further delay in rendering justice to the common people of the society who are already suffering from delaying process of justice.
The senior advocate challenged the legality and constitutional validity of the NJAC Act, 2014 saying that it is violative of Articles 14, 21 and other provisions of the Constitution and the foundation for the principle of judicial independence.
The petitioner said that on December 31, 2014, President of India has given his assent to two bills including, the NJAC Bill, 2014 and the constitution (121 Amendment) Bill, 2014 and "the aforesaid two Acts have caused excessive dominance of the executive in the mater of appointment of judges to the superior judiciary as well as in the formation of its structural composition discarding the opinion of Chief Justice of India."
"... In all the matters thereof totally derogating the indispensable independence and integrity of the judiciary, which is inconsistent with the letter and spirit of the Constitution contrary with the oath and affirmation made and subscribed bearing "Allegiance to the Constitution of India", it said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 05 2015 | 8:30 PM IST

Next Story