Police file status report on immoral trafficking

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Sep 17 2016 | 10:42 PM IST
Police have filed a status report in the Madras High Court, detailing the cases registered under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act since 2013 to July 2016.
It states that more than 2,500 human traffickers, including women involved in online prostitution in the city, have been arrested under the Act during the period.
The details were filed by the ADGP, CB-CID yesterday before a bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice R Mahadevan as per an earlier direction of the court on a PIL filed by one Y Akbar Ahmed.
The petitioner submitted that he chanced upon a website while surfing the Internet andfound some pornographic content with nude and semi-nude pictures of women.
Contending that online pornographic content could adversely affect the society, especially the youth, the petitioner said, "Due to the growing free sex culture through cyber pornography, strong steps should be taken to check online porn content."
He contended that pornography had a bad effect on the youth as well as adults, leading to various social and medical problems as well as incidents of crime.
The petitioner submitted that section 67 of the Information and Technology Act, 2000 made it clear that watching obscene material, pornography on computer or mobile phone was a crime, attracting severe punishment to the producers, distributors and viewers of such sites.
In his status report, the ADGP submitted that since 2013 to July 2016, about 2,500 human traffickers, including women involved in online prostitution in the city, were arrested under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act and 100 among them were detained under the Goondas Act.
The bench, which found fault with the prosecution for not handing over the advance copy of the report to the petitioner before the hearing of the case, asked it to file the compliance report three days before the next hearing and serve the advance copy on the petitioner failing which the authorities would have to pay Rs 10,000 as cost.
The bench posted the matter for further hearing on November 18.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 17 2016 | 10:42 PM IST

Next Story