Process for Padma awards still not complete: MHA

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 03 2015 | 5:22 PM IST
The Padma awards for this year may have been announced but the Union Home Ministry feels that the "process is yet not completed" as it refused to provide various details related to the awardees.
In a major deviation from the practice of the UPA government of providing information on selection process of Padma awards just after their announcement on the eve of Republic Day, the Ministry has rejected a plea on February 27 saying the "the process is yet not completed".
The response to withhold information was given on the RTI application filed by activist Subhash Agrawal who had sought to know details of the selection process of this year's awardees.
Agrawal through his Right to Information application sought to know from the Home Ministry the names of awards committee members and names/number of endorsed persons which were later rejected by tax, intelligence or other bodies after their names were endorsed by the awards committee.
He also sought to know from the ministry the complete details on telephonic-confirmation sought from members of awards committee on any recommendation for Padma award, names endorsed by the committee but not included in final list, reasons on not including endorsed names in the final list.
Agrawal also asked several other details from the Ministry like whether any recommendations were made by the President, the Vice-President, the Prime Minister after the deadline to submit recommendations was over.
In its reply dated February 27, Central Public Information Officer said, "The process for Padma Awards 2015 has not yet been completed. Hence, no information can be provided at this stage."
"It seems that present Union government is bent upon preventing transparency in its working when now Union Ministry for Home Affairs (MHA) shockingly and surprisingly deviated from its earlier practice to provide information on selection process of Padma awards just after their announcement on the eve of Republic Day (25th January) every year," Agrawal claimed.
He suggested that instead of a slowly killing RTI Act, the Union government can save funds by repealing the Act rather than providing 'non-information' on RTI petitions like the one quoted above.
He also alleged that the PMO has lost its reputation for being one the best public authorities to respond to RTI petitions.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 03 2015 | 5:22 PM IST

Next Story