Observing that MCX-SX had entered into long-term agreements with its related party Financial Technologies (India) Ltd (FTIL) that entailed various restrictive clauses as well as high costs, the CAG said the PSU bank nominees failed to review those agreements.
"The PSU banks had 67 per cent shareholding as of March 31, 2010 and had their nominees on the board of the company (MCX-SX) during April 30, 2010, to September 20, 2012. These nominees of PSU banks on the board of MCX-SX did not review these unfavourable agreements and failed to protect the interest of the banks they represented," said the CAG report, which was tabled in the Rajya Sabha.
MCX-SX, CAG said, had entered into long-term agreements with FTIL for its exchange operations, which included purchase and maintenance of software and network infrastructure services.
"These agreements had restrictive clauses that were against the interest of the company which made exit from the agreements by way of termination and finding alternative vendor difficult for the company. MCX-SX made a total payment of Rs 303.75 crore to FTIL during 2008-09 to 2013-14 which amounted to 52 per cent of the total expenditure of the company," CAG said.
