PWD contracts: Court calls for status report on FIRs

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 03 2017 | 5:23 PM IST
A Delhi court today directed the Anti-Corruption Branch to submit a status report on three FIRs lodged in a complaint accusing Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and others for alleged irregularities in the grant of contracts for roads and sewer lines.
District Judge Talwant Singh issued notice to the investigating officer (IO) of the case and asked him to file the report on July 5, the next date of hearing.
The matter came up before the district judge for deciding upon the jurisdiction issue in the matter.
Earlier, metropolitan magistrate Abhilash Malhotra had referred the matter to the district and sessions judge, after noting that the ACB had already lodged an FIR under the Prevention of Corruption (PC) Act.
Cases pertaining to the ACB and under the PC Act are tried by a special court.
ACB had earlier filed a report before the magistrate that the Gautam Budh Nagar police has informed that there was no threat to the life of complainant Rahul Sharma within their jurisdiction.
The court had on June 2 directed the additional commissioner of the ACB to assess the threat perception regarding Sharma once again after he submitted that on May 30 two unidentified motorcycle-borne persons fired gun shots at him when he was travelling in his car along with a cousin.
ACB had registered three separate FIRs on its own on May eight regarding alleged irregularities in granting the contracts.
The court was hearing a complaint filed by Sharma, founder of Roads Anti-Corruption Organisation (RACO), seeking a direction to the police to lodge an FIR against Kejriwal, his brother-in-law Surender Bansal, proprietor of a construction firm, and a public servant for alleged irregularities in the grant of contracts for roads and sewer lines in Delhi.
Bansal died in May this year.
The complaint alleged "deep-rooted corruption" and that no material was actually purchased for executing the projects.
It alleged that documents showing purchase of material were "concocted and forged", and a loss of over Rs 10 crore had been caused to the public exchequer.
The complainant alleged that Bansal operated through several dummy firms to obtain government contracts with the connivance of several senior PWD officials.
These contracts never got executed "whereas shockingly all the payments were cleared under pressure from Kejriwal", he alleged.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 03 2017 | 5:23 PM IST

Next Story