A bench of justices GK Vyas and MK Garg also directed the state government to file a reply clarifying the legal provisions pertaining to religious conversion in the state.
Hearing a habeas corpus petition
filed by the 22-year-old woman's brother, the bench expressed anger over the "negligence" of the police, which allegedly refused to file an FIR on her family's complaint.
"By this way, tomorrow, even I could address myself as Gopal Mohammad," it said.
In his petition, the brother claimed that one Faiz Modi had been harassing his sister for long and abducted her while she was going to college.
She was made to sign some papers by him and fake marriage documents were prepared, he alleged.
When the family members could not find her, they approached the police which refused to file an FIR stating that Faiz Modi had already produced proof of marriage and an affidavit of religious conversion by the woman dated April 14, the brother alleged.
Appearing from the petitioner, lawyer Gokulesh Bohra argued that the girl was with her family till October 25, while the documents were predated by six months.
"This is a clear case of 'love jihad' and over half a dozen such cases have already been reported in the city in the past some time due to the disinterest shown by the police in investigating these cases," Bohra claimed.
It has been alleged that Hindu girls are being lured into conversion and marriage by Muslim men and it is often termed as "love jihad' especially by Hindu outfits.
The court directed that the girl be sent to Nari Niketan (women shelter) for seven days and instructed the police to ensure that no one meets her there.
Seeking a detailed report in the matter, the court asked the police whether it tried to probe the truth of the purported affidavit by the girl.
It directed the police to file an FIR and probe the matter.
The matter comes in the backdrop of the controversy over a case of a Kerala Hindu woman, who had converted to Islam before marrying a Muslim man, Shafin Jahan.
It was alleged that the woman was recruited by Islamic State's mission in Syria and Jahan was only a stooge.
Ashokan K M, the father of the woman, had alleged that there was a "well-oiled systematic mechanism" for conversion and Islamic radicalisation.
Jahan had on September 20 approached the apex court seeking recall of its August 16 order directing the NIA to investigate the controversial case.
The matter is now before the apex court.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
