Realty biz survives on home buyers' money; can't compromise their right to own houses: SC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 23 2019 | 9:01 PM IST

Real estate business in India has survived mainly on home buyers' money which cannot be allowed to be siphoned off by builders, the Supreme Court said Tuesday and asserted that the right of the middle class to own houses cannot be compromised.

The apex court, which cancelled the registration of Amrapali Group under the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act (RERA) 2016, said the matter before it is of larger public interest as "several lakhs of home buyers have been cheated" by erring builders.

A bench of Justices Arun Mishra and U U Lalit said large number of projects have come up not only in Noida and Greater Noida but also in other places and most of them have not been completed by builders, who have siphoned off home buyers' money at a large scale.

"The matter projects the issue of larger public interest. The real estate business has developed and it mainly survived by the money invested by the buyer for the purchase of the house. They have the right to obtain houses," the bench said in its 270-page judgement.

It said that facts of the Amrapali case projected that Noida and Greater Noida authorities have allotted huge plots to the builders by charging a sum of approximately 10 percent and in most of the cases, no money has been paid thereafter.

"No action has been taken by the Noida and Greater Noida Authorities against builders for cancellation of leases due to violation to fulfil their obligation," it said.

Referring to the facts and circumstances of the case, the bench said, "It goes to indicate how at large-scale middle-class home buyers have been defrauded of their hard-earned money, taken away by the affluent and the officials in connivance with each other. Law has to book all of them."
The bench said that lakhs of home buyers have been cheated as if there is "no machinery of law left to take care of such situation and no fear left with the promoters/builders that such acts are not perceivable in a civilised society."

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 23 2019 | 9:01 PM IST

Next Story